From my third roll of Hale-Bopp shots:
Note that all of these images are 120 dpi scans made from 4"x6"
prints, saved as quality-factor 100 JPEGs. That means each is about
250K, and rather slow to download. Those of you using modem connections will
want to use the "smaller filesize" image links at the right side of the
list. These smaller files are each 20-25K and retain nearly all of
the larger JPEGs detail and shading.
The best of the shots are 16a and 12a. The former looks better as
scanned, whilst the latter looks better in the flesh. Especially look
at the closeup of 16a down below. 6a-11a show the comet high above a
Pacific sunset (the hill I shot these from looks down on both Silicon
Valley and the Pacific Ocean). Of the sunset shots, 11a is the best
and 9a is runner-up.
The telephoto shots (frames 17a-23a, taken with my 135mm lens) are
unfortunately disappointing, due to the fact that they were shot
through a hazy cloud which I didn't see till after the fact. (See
frames 33a and 35a for both a nice, wide view of the sky in which I
was shooting, and a clear view of the aforementioned cloud.) Of the
telephoto shots, 23a then 22a are the best looking as scanned images.
33a has the most visible ion tail (in blue) except for the closeup
scan of 16a.
35a is a nice, wide-angle view of the nighttime sky with the comet,
though it looks uch better in the print than in the scan.
There are also 300 dpi close-ups of the comet from frames
13a,
16a, and
17a.
Finally, there are three other versions of frame 6, demonstrating JPEG
quality-factors
95 (84 KB) ,
90 (41 KB) , and
75 (22 KB) . These demonstrate what a difference
in filesize accepting a little image degradation can mean.